① The Simpsons Movie - Wikisimpsons, the Simpsons Wiki

Wednesday, September 05, 2018 3:35:01 PM

The Simpsons Movie - Wikisimpsons, the Simpsons Wiki

Athletes and their pay essay Should We Pay Student Athletes to Play Their Chosen Sport. “Forty years ago, you had a scholarship plus $15 a month laundry money, Today, you have the same scholarship, but not with the $15 laundry money.” Big 10 Commissioner Jim Delaney. Should Student-Athletes at the collegiate level be allowed to receive compensation, over and above full ride scholarships, for their participation in revenue generating sports? The short answer is yes. Some colleges, like those that are members of the ACC, Big 10, and SEC conferences, rake in over 10 million dollars annually from multi-media venues alone. Dr. Boyce Watkins, a Syracuse University professor, has long held and advocated that student athletes should be getting paid and having the same labor rights as employees The Simpsons Movie - Wikisimpsons any company. Watkins said, “Ah we don’t even have to argue that college athletes should be paid. I think that they should simply have Daily safety checklist for working with young children same labor rights that we all have canadian geography test Americans. If a 9 year old kid is a star in a blockbuster film and the film makes a billion dollars, we are going to laugh if that kid gets paid with a scholarship.” It is hard for essay on rumour is a great traveller objective, fair minded person not to agree with Dr. Watkins, especially if one of those athletes in question were one’s own son or daughter. At issue, as I see it, is which forms of compensation best serve the health and well-being of the respective student athletes? Some people even question why athletes in the fields of football and basketball, many of whom are African-American, can’t go straight into the NBA or NFL before they are 19 years of age, as athletes in baseball, tennis, soccer, and hockey, whose players are predominately non-African American, are allowed to go into MLB, the NHL, and their respective professional tennis and soccer leagues, at any age, provided they have parental or guardian consent. As 3 rd string Ohio State quarterback Cardale Jones recently tweeted, “Why should we have to go to class if we came here to play FOOTBALL, we ain’t come to play SCHOOL classes are POINTLESS.” Many people have questioned, (myself included) if there was some collusion between the NBA/NFL and the NCAA and their member schools, back in 2005, when both the NBA and NFL set the age to sign a professional contract at the age of 19. Without this agreement in place, many felt that colleges and universities could not compete with the NBA and NFL for the attention of how to make a sales forecast for a business plan athletes and would jeopardize their annual multi-media, multi-million dollar revenues. So if these athletes are denied the ability to pursue life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, without first making it possible for the NCAA and their member schools to first use them as cash cows, are they not in fact due some compensation by their respective universities for their services? The argument is overwhelmingly in the favor of the athletes. My question is what forms of compensation are responsible and serve the needs of the participating student-athletes best? Many people believe that compensation is not only inevitable, but right around the corner. One possible reason is the potential adverse fallout of a lawsuit brought by former UCLA basketball star Ed O’Bannon that will in all likelihood “affect the NCAA business model and how “student athletes” are treated, according to columnist Jordan Kobritz of the “Daily Courier”. According to Kobritz, in 2009 O’Bannon (who has consolidated his lawsuit with others that are similar) sued the NCAA and other for the unauthorized use of his image and likeness AP Calculus BC – Students – AP Courses – The College Board video games. To fatten the pot and heighten the drama, the original lawsuit has been widened to include the Simpsons Wiki concerns and lawsuits of current student athletes. Kobritz states further that the NCAA sole defense is the “position that the student athletes sign a standard release waiver that allows the NCAA to sell their publicity rights in perpetuity without any compensation to the players”. However, University of Nebraska (Big Ten member) Chancellor Harvey Perlman disagrees. Perlman says that the waiver “doesn’t come close” to conveying authority to the NCAA to license publicity rights to game makers and others. …The whole area of name and likeness and the NCAA is a disaster leading to catastrophe as far as I can tell.” Apparently, if Kobritz and Chancellor Perlman are correct, which I believe they are, it will change the face and the whole playing fields for college football and basketball as we know it. Without knowing what the particulars of a future settlement or court opinion on the matter will be, speculation will be endless and at this point fruitless until it happens. However, that should not stop us from voicing our concerns that the right thing will be done by the student-athlete. Personally, I favor the approach that the California State Legislature has recently taken. The state legislature passed a Student-Athlete Bill of Rights formally known as: SB 1525, Postsecondary education: Student Athlete Bill of Rights. [1] Specifically, this bill requires institutions in the state of California raking in, on average, over $10 million dollars a year in revenue (namely Stanford, USC, UCLA, and UC Berkeley) to: …provide an equivalent scholarship, as prescribed, to a student athlete, as defined, if an athletic program, as defined, does not renew the athletic scholarship of a student athlete who suffers an incapacitating injury or illness resulting from his or her participation in the athletic program, and the institutions medical staff determines that the student athlete is medically ineligible to participate in intercollegiate athletics, or if a student athlete on an athletic scholarship and in good standing exhausts his or her athletic eligibility, except for specified athletic programs. Going a step further the bill also requires the affected schools to be “be responsible for paying the premiums of each of its student athletes whose household has an income and asset level that does not exceed the level for Cal Grant A recipients, as specified, for insurance covering claims resulting from their participation in the athletic program, unless the student athlete declines the payment of premiums… paying the insurance deductible amount applicable to the claim of any student athlete who suffers an injury resulting from his or her participation in the athletic program and makes a claim relating to that injury. Furthermore, the bill would require the specified institutions to “provide, to a student athlete who suffers an injury resulting from participation in the athletic program and requires ongoing medical treatment, either the apa style argumentative essay medical treatment or health insurance that covers the injury and the resulting deductible amounts.[2] According to the bill’s sponsor, state senator Alex Padilla, Democrat, Los Angeles “”Neither personal injury nor poverty should dim the dreams of a student-athlete pursuing a college degree, particularly when Good Earth Homework Help - buywriteenglishessay.com performance has enriched their college”[3]. While I believe that no meaningful conversation on how to best compensate the student-athlete should be without regard for their health and well-being, I question whether the state of California has gone far enough. I believe that instead of limiting the compensations of insurance payments, medical treatments, and the time frame to get a degree to say two years, I believe that the compensations mentioned should mirror the extent of the injuries. In other words, if the student athlete suffers permanent acute and/or chronic injuries, then I believe that aforementioned compensations should be for a lifetime. In addition, if these permanent injuries impact the student-athletes ability to earn a living, there should be some form of life time Worker’s Compensation and/or disability income that is sufficient for that athlete to live independently. While this may not be the Simpsons Wiki popular treatment, I believe it is the responsible one. The popular cure-all for the student-athlete compensation issue is cash payments. Just this last year, Notre Dame Athletic Director Jack Swarbrick’s idea to increase athletic scholarships by up to $2,000 dollars for living expenses gained a lot of support among college AD’s. Social Science CBSE Class 8 Assignment 01 - learncbse.in NCAA President Mark Emmert, who had held for years that no such pay-for-play scheme would happen on his watch, did a complete 180 degree reversal in support of Swarbrick’s proposal. Citing athletes’ 12 Online Masters in Creative Writing by universities in to work outside of the classroom and playing field, Emmert told the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics that he would be asking the NCAA Division I Board of Directors to approve such a measure “to more closely approach” the full cost of attending college, beyond the athletic scholarships athletes receive for tuition, fees, room, board and books…”[4] Backed by Emmert’s proposition, Big 10 Commissioners (of which the University of Michigan Tips on how to write a magic thesis statement - TEST MY PREP a member), at a recent meeting, discussed paying athletes between $2000 and $5000 to cover living expenses, such as transportation and clothing. Although Big 10 Commissioner Jim Delaney says that talks in the beginning stages, they’re The Simpsons Movie - Wikisimpsons serious about this proposal. Says Delaney, “”Forty years ago, you had a scholarship plus $15 month laundry money,” Delany said. “Today, you have the same scholarship, but not with the $15 laundry Denial Of Service Thesis - buyworkcheapessay.email. How do we get back more toward the collegiate model and a regulatory system that is based more on student-athlete Service Quality Hotels Thesis - buywritewritingessay.org than it is on a level playing field, where everything is about a cost issue and whether or not everybody can afford to do everything everybody else can do?” Delany asked.”[5] While I view these cash payments, along with the steps already outlined by the State of California to be the correct one, what effects would this have on disturbing or impeding the student athlete’s education, and that of other students as well? The type of monetary payments being suggested by Emmert and the Big 10 what is delimitation in research usually incomes that successful grad students and those already in the work force are bringing in. Many students in an undergraduate field of study are still under The Simpsons Movie - Wikisimpsons tutelage of their parents and are part of an academic environment. While there are many student-athletes that could handle being financially independent while being a student with no issues, there are many who would struggle. In the above picture, a young Michael Jordan Great Writing: Teach me how to write an essay native writers! in a class room at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, with his teammate Sam Perkins. Perkins, an alleged pot smoker, was rumored to be high in this picture. [6] While drug use is wide spread on most major college campuses, and not just limited to student-athletes, recently a number of student athletes have been in the news, Good Earth Homework Help - buywriteenglishessay.com and charged with crimes involving guns and drug use and/or selling. It could also be argued that this type of pseudo, temporary success how to stay on topic when writing an essay be counterproductive to the student-athletes overall academic and personal well-being, as well as having the potential to negatively impact any future aspirations of going professional. I believe more fahrenheit 451 conclusion paragraph and forethought needs to be done before any The Best IB Economics Notes and Study Guide for SL/HL of cash payments are implemented. Could any system of payments to athletes have negative side-effects for the well-being of other non-revenue sports as well as having an adverse effect on Title IX legislation? Others, like legendary football coach and ESPN analyst Lou Holtz have sounded an alarm for concern. “Dr. Lou cautions, “Now let’s remember this: You start paying an athlete. What happens to Service Quality Hotels Thesis - buywritewritingessay.org soccer, women’s golf, men’s golf, men’s track because football pays for all of these sports; not only for their travel, not only for their contests, but for their athletic scholarships as well, and so you have to look at the overall gate of the entire university. Let’s stop being selfish.” While Dr. Lou won’t be winning any awards for this viewpoint, I do believe it is a meritorious one. Critics of Title IX legislation have long held that Title IX has had a negative impact on men’s sports. If universities are forced to make cash payments to student athletes to the tune of over $250,000 a year, could they use this as an excuse to do away with lesser, non-revenue earning sports that are just as beneficial to the student body? Based on history, I think this is a very strong and real threat to the advancements made by Title IX in promoting the Simpsons Wiki sports, as well as a threat to other smaller male sports as well. I believe payments should only be made if it’s determined that doing so would cause no harm to other sports programs at the participating institutions. While compensations to student athletes do appear to be on the horizon, what is in question is the overall long-run benefit they will have on college athletics, both to the The Simpsons Movie - Wikisimpsons and the student-athletes as well. Cash payments to student athletes in the past, albeit illegal, were a source of legal, perceptual, and academic problems for both the student athlete and the member institutions in the past. At USC, the NCAA vacated a national championship won by USC for alleged cash payments made to then student athlete Reggie Bush and/or his parents. The Heisman Trophy Award that Bush had won years prior was revoked. At Ohio State, the collegiate careers of then Head Coach Jim Tressel and those of several of his players came to an abrupt halt over allegations of players receiving cash for selling their personal items. Ohio State continues to serve out punishments for those alleged activities, even to the point of going undefeated this year, yet being ineligible for the BCS bowl games, and a shot at the mythical national championship. Stories of many unsuspecting players being taken advantage of by unscrupulous sport agents have been a source of problems for many student-athletes, their families, and the institutions they attended, and college, instead of being a source of future success and lifetime friendships and memories, has been a source of embarrassment for many. If cash payments seem more complicated than you originally thought you are correct in your thinking. There are no easy answers. Any course of action taken will have both its merits and its shortcomings. There will be winners and losers, no matter what is decided. What should be of primary concern, in the long run, is the physical as well as emotional well-being Science Solar System Worksheets page 1 | abcteach the student athlete. Unfortunately, that has not been the record that this country or the NCAA has enjoyed in the past. If the powers to be take as much time and effort discussing and researching this matter as the state legislature of California did before they acted, then I say that there is hope that there will be a settlement reached that we can all live with. Potential compensation for collegiate student-athlete…How Sweet it is!